- What it implies; For example, higher crime rates=higher scientific findings, studying murder, as murder=good. This is what conservatives phycologists’ don’t understand?
^ this is an example of deliberately setting the goal to understand via verbatim here
notice the patterns that all of the words follow.
feelings change, thoughts change; therefore feelings, too, are a form of a thought process
“only way this can go is bad” is never the case because you can never experience the exact same thing twice
what if we never made mistakes? we’d never be motivated to live because lack of understanding powers curiosity which makes us want to live as otherwise
respect exist only in the head
freedom to be lazy and still sustain a good life is what i define freedom as
follow the law is motivated by morality and others, as it’s not a scientific concept, rather it’s meant to be vague and confusing
measuring caring and love
socialisms shouldn’t be described are people advocating for ideas, as this itself is based on perspective, rather should be described as a state of enlightenment, awareness experience that is to be reached, experienced.
see: think in terms of states of mind.
measuring organzing opinions
the best medicine is prevention
prevention is the best cure
stop it before is starts because once it starts it can’t stop
I need something that motivates me to follow social constructs. A: understand why hierarchy is a necessity like Jordan Peterson
possible desires=possible possibilities=possible experiences to undergo
reasonable reasons put into verbatim as a certain state of mind
everything is a form of a personal problem
predicting opinions- or are opinions themselves are form of predictions themselves
more opinionated=more reaction(ary)
susceptible to experience must learn from
libs have the abnormal lifestyles
Chasing feelings = Meaning
made up words expressed via verbatim; for example, calling one indoctrinated, smart or stupid, republicans are already known to stigmatize labels
respectance of desires existing in place is what makes one feel as if people are authoritarian; for example, left wingers wouldn’t kill people, but rather they respect the bourgeoise in order to not to want to kill them but rather want to overthrow them with a revolution in time coming
Here is my opinion, reasons for being a liberal and why I will stay a liberal.
Because conservatism, by nature makes people think that they know everything.
in the same way where you are unable to completely express love in such a manner, the same thing can be said about the describe of experiences via words, verbatim.
Economics shouldn’t even be a thing, it’s all in the head and only only in the head. Therefore identifying economic ideas are a forced opinion. Measuring from kids’ perspective, since kids don’t know about economics when they are born, which is an indication that it’s a measured opinion as such.
When calling one indoctrinated what exactly are you describing (see: specifying parts of speech), the changes to what variable? liberal indoctrination not even a valid phrase
Opinions are just how much you lack understanding of the natural world, and the more opinionated the more delusional you are and vice versa interchangeable words.
even wanting to run away from someone else as a reaction is a form of an opinion to via behavior, it’s just not normally treated like one, by others, happening to you.
Experience=process=whatever is considered physically ideally.
being a conservative is only a part of being a liberal
Perspective possibility: possible perspectives
separate facts from feelings like serial killers liked killings and feel good about it whilst Republicans feel the opposite
Republicans just like to speak and judge, they don’t actually like to go out and do, explore, travel, etc.
Five types of possible experiences: Curious (science, new), Vague rules (early conclusions, put into words), or death (see: happy wheels: funny ways to die edition), controlled by others this is why I claim that conservatives aren’t very aware (this is a necessity in order to stay motivated to be moral), (it’s supposed to be) up and down,
You may not know this or how to put this into words, but you are actually emotionally attached to your body
your body ACTS LIKE A TOOL, a filter
making decision solely based on feelings; For example quitting because you’re tired not because you’re actually done.
knowing the difference between personal opinion
Be alone, most people think if this as bad, but it isn’t. it’s a trap, it’s a dead end only bad type of possibility: like shooting yourself in the head. bored of practicing morality because there is no new things.
thinking in terms of states of mind the less special it becomes
Thinking=/= experiencing; In the same way easier said than done.
realize that you are pretending more than often
Theory: we are all fake people, there is nothing as a genius friend, unless that friend is yourself. There is no such thing as your feelings and my feelings: as divided like that. We are all interconnected.
Whatever you do do it for your own feelings satisfaction
Acting like: “*an example of these words*”; for example, acting like a dog, personification, etc.
As long as you are not dead, you can still recover.
Socialism is supposed to be imagined not practiced
realize and wake up, see the patterns in your own behavior, define who yo are and keep being aware of this definition.
There is only one way the goal for everyone it’s just whomever puts in the energy to care to identify, plan and pursue such goals
know what experience do avoid pro life is a dead end desire conclusion, pro life no new experience with *x, pl’ers act like everyone is pro life like them, with the same desires and all, proving that pro life is a form of a desires expressed via verbatim
Don’t want to experience, using words itself is always intimation words are always overthinking, thinking is overthinking.
“i don’t want to be a Christian anymore”
Learned via peer pressure
There are no such things are criminals, there are only scientists who’ve gotten very curious and wants to push the limits of law and getting caught.
Republicans use the word liberal as in liberal bias to come away from facts, as an excuse; a clear example of how labels can be used to ideally manipulate one into performing such a calculation.
Wanting to performing the calculation of calling it a liberal bias and wanting to stay with society is an example of an opinion itself
being pro life (and moralistic for hat manner) is preventing the need for getting an abortion (be aware of this fact and realistic possibilities of humane limits); preventing the desires from developing.
^ This comes from interpreting the behaviors of those who go in moral outrages.
What if you wanted to abort a baby, like deliberately, or on purpose.
What is the point in sharing this info?
Key, map scale to read the map, for example 1 inch on map is 1 mile irl.
Is coming to a consencious a form of practicing groupthink?
no such thing as 
Practicing morality is like constant reactions, motivation to pursue hierarchy because of using the info gained for respectance
reps try to speak for the poor, but the poor speak enough with their behavior, them struggling
It’s a good thing that you realized that you don’t want to chase it because the answers lie in the present tense not theoretically imagined words like economics contents
What is the most least opinionated job? A: left-leaning jobs.
Conservatives reach more dead ended dogmatic conclusions than liberal (new) ideas do.
set the goal to understand not to short term judge as a form of a reaction.
different possible ways to interpret the bible [behavior]
liberally diversity means to not be emotionally attached to one set of ideas.
What does it mean to understand why? Since why is a much bigger reason, and it’s a reason rather why is in action as a form of physical information (put into ideas, as words ofc)
motivation is nature changing as a variable aware of this as part of the universe aware of how nature works is how you work
an example of interpreting behavior like sales man manipulative
What is the format of why? (see: mind map) It’s much bigger than you think.
once perfection starts, imperfection will never come back
Inspirational keywords: free market <-> free wills, aware of behavior = aware of natures’ motivation to sustain and act (because nature is a person that has behavior too)
how to measure skill sets
is denying racism a form of racisms itself
What is natures’ motivation for living, continuing to be nature?
thinking in terms of nature and not being divisive.
confusing thing to do is put into words
pragmatic tips: planning when to plan, planning is a form of behavior, a set of ideas that are to be chased, pragmatically
right wing or left wing we are still a part of the same wing which is a part of nature
Liberal bias is used as a slur, in context by right wingers but in reality it’s a good thing.
moral =/= resonable
easy to distract someone but hard to get back on track
I need something new to keep me motivated to live or else all is boring
question words themselves, and their existence and usage and what the words are doing themselves in the head (are they confusion you, etc?)
feelings are mine do it for self realize this
What you see as good I see as the opposite
Why are you asking questions? A: Naturally to understand; don’t return ask me why does it matter that you know this because I’ve already answered it via my behavior: it’s because I am curious
Defining voluntary and force as you are forced not to murder by the govt. in the same way you are “forced” to pay living wages for employees.
End goal or manipulative desires. Sticking to end goal is just a lack of motivation for pursue other goals, opinions, tempting is a form of an opinion too and you mustn’t even be tempted with new things and not even have to experience the presence of new things.
Desire manipulation (opinion) by the second, how often does what you want change, ever care (deliberately set the goal) to notice this?
Pro life is still a part of a conspiracy theory see: ideas only exist in head, therefore, pro lifers respect pro choicers ideas and existsiance but still, seeing that as a barrier (solely in the head) the pro lifers then move onto passive aggressiveness.
Are you(your identity) the idea that you (care enough to put the energy into focusing upon) focus upon?
Technically speaking, considering the past and becomming aware, aren’t we all forced some way shape or form; for example, being by others makes one want to be moral, and not being by others and needing to kill in order to survive makes one immoral- that’s how behavior works.
Site ideas: blatantlyhonest.wordpress.com
answering the question (by the second passes what question are you answering: you are answering what will I spend my time doing as of right now, this portion of my life?) which convinced you the most is like asking what changes feelings the most, even thought they were both expressing feelings via verbatim
Running the program in head meme.exe
Conservatism is all only about necessary evils.
Pro life doesn’t work because not everyone cooperates (since some Americans are pro-choice); since morality is to work based on cooperation for society
realize the pattern: it looks good in the beginning but bad in the end
Instead of using vague words, describe what is actually changing, like scientifically- instead of creating and using labels like liberal with a negative stigma around it.
What only exists because you cooperate? A: morality.
Think in terms of specific changes by the (mili)second because if we don’t we cannot go anywhere else, we wouldn’t be anywhere without scientist, so pay respects to scientists by voting Democratic.
Just because [insert criteria here] doesn’t mean [insert goal of identifying as a winner here]
good too be bored as an indicator that you are a scientist need a challenge
Vague words have gotten boring, bored of simplicity
personal opinion are personals problems : don’t force it onto me
adults are children too
what is motivated to
The republican state mind isn’t anything specials, even if republicans’ don’t care to interpret behavior.
Specific goals only have one possibility.
Facts are an ongoing present-tense process
formulate morality artificial limits
your personal feelings (categorizing as ideally) regarding me meaning nothing, respecting opinions as existence means to not understand ones own opinions
Being satisfied with a crappy conservative life is an example of desire manipulation as a form of necessary evil.
opinions vague are always in the vague format
ackwnodlege the complexity of situation by asking more questions or setting the goal to feel feelings.
still with questions unanswered= do not make conclusion acting like you know everything
abortion is a personal problem
Why have morality worked so long for society?
using words to describe experiences existing
explain feeling attachment to idea via verbatim; for example, claiming that I am very sensitive to this idea.
“you don’t need to be as scientist to know this is wrong”
Deeming it as an important idea
Sympathize with the pro choicer categorizing it as reproductive rights.
Conservatives attitude is a part of the problem that is plaguing society, we need to change that variable, it’s not us libs that need to change.
See: I don’t have time to hate murderers enough or theoretically hate women who get abortions.
Other: angry divisive punishment personal opinions bored of practicing morality energy limited for lifetime lifestyle correlation think I am tired of having to practice rule that get me nowhere
TIP: Know what you’ll be doing first, then perform it; experience it; via the curriculum- the point is, is to know what will happen.
^ This proves that nothing is really new, rather we just experience the event in action.
why specifically me as in why me lord
it tastes like [it] feels like [it] etc.
sense of [privacy]
need something to work on as a problem to fix like cops schedule as interchange variables
meaning is feeling attachment
real reason for being pro life is feelings dopamine’s is produces problem solely in head
allowing self to want following policy
mapping out state of mind see it as a state of mind as a pov; look bad on paper (hitting in theory anything pragmatic) and bad on paper (socialisms good ideally state of mind); know the differences
How do you know, plan to change opinion later: means to look for new answers acknowledging the fact that you don’t know everything.
TIP: Follow curriculum, never make actual conclusions
The goal isn’t just to reach that state of mind for 1 or 2 seconds to receive a bit of a dopamine’s boost, but rather to maintain that until you die, and you can do this, (TIP HERE): VIA A SCHEDULE WITH INTERCHANGABLE VARIABLES, allowing yourself to want different things only at a certain time frame.
Science is just studying yourself, your own senses and how things: things as in atoms, particles, in specific, react to your existsiance (bodies’ senses) by the second.
Science is something that can happen to you not you happen to it
Set the goal to understand and you will have no feelings; As mentioned above if someone else gets in the way of you transferring info from surroundings, then that’s going to stop learning curriculum. Its like someone barging into science lab and coughing all over the place, the point is, is that it’s going to mess up some of experiments’ specifics.
Libertarianism and directly affecting
not everyone values the same ethics – this is proof that we put feelings on a different matter here. Using this sentence will only help one become aware of the fact that we are only emotionally attached to said sentences.
does everyone have the same basic ethics
According to the definition of ethics (moral principles that govern a person’s behavior or the conducting of an activity.), we are subconsciously actually constantly being governed by ideas of morality.
you don’t actually know this (are aware of this: because you cannot always put feeling into words) but you pretend more than you think that you do, for example when talking with others you delude yourself imagine physically respecting and pretend to respect them, which is deemed as actually respect someone since vague system and not nature reality system that’s how feelings work
you don’t actually touch anything; It has to do with measuring things existsiance of passage of events in terms of electrons.
check on scale unit of measurement
Feelings existing is proof that you are unnecessarily making a big deal out of something.
Always manipulated to want, possible desires, why do you think we need new lawmakers based on unexpected events that occur.
Does unexpected mean unaware since we are born scientists in the learning phase?
Being pro death penalty for the reasons of being confidence attached to the idea that it deters murderers is a personal problem not a pragmatically applicable problem, a problem that, potential murderers too, need to change themselves.
The drama, too, is a part of politics, it’s all intentional, and it acts as form or motivation or average people.
You see something as good and bad, it’s just that you don’t know it yet; For example liberals see being moral as bad and something that is to never to be engaged in (and will not change their minds about it), in the same way Republicans see murder as bad and would never even do it. And until republicans can acknowledge and sympathize with this liberal mindset, they will never be able to understand us.
Liberals believe that merely being in the pro-life state of mind as something bad– as an infringement on civil liberties. They don’t want to change or have others change to be pro-life. See: seeing it as as state of mind, not as ideas or behaviors that are to be taken personally. Knowing when to take what personally.
Pro life as a form of woman abusing
And pro death penalty for born people is valid feelings to have.
acting in public is interpreted as vague behavior.
check on science fiction and nature of this specific physical realm
Check on “getting in the way of” Either you got in my way or I got in yours, is what morality is.
Conservative opinions are more opinionated, (need to measure public opinion here) meaning that they’re based on more feelings-related dogma. For example, they see the world in terms of property rights and not nature as nature. They use labels such as illegals to describes others’ desires, actions as divided.
by measuring opinions we are seeing how far you are deluded in your own world.
Saying I am an atheist is just saying I haven’t performed the calculation to conclude weather or not a God exists or not. It’s like saying I don’t know what the answer to 100×100 is because I am intimated (putting feelings into words here) by it’s large numbers.
In the same way one can submit and perform [2-proof that thoughts are just considerations] the thought of killing someone or not, the same thing with abortion, don’t act like a slave to ideas (aka the law that is supposed to be directly enforced)
Some things just aren’t meant to be, some contents are to be solely said and not written (at the same time, I don’t have 4 arms to do this you know!) and others are to be written and not stated
For me there is a difference in personal values and enforcing the contents of my values (see: labels don’t change contents of said person, only change what is as stored in your mind according to the nature of nature) onto others via the law; I am personally pro life, and but politically pro choice.
think in terms of possible definitions, think in terms of rights and wrong, think in terms of possible thinking in terms of. See: check on scale unit of measurement
Thinking in terms of variables, considering physicals subconsciously but not explicitly acknowledged via verbatim
Satisfied my only curiosity
Your feelings are my feelings
“It’s not there unless you think it is”
What if I was immune to stupidity, the only way to be this immune is if you didn’t have to be forced to experience it by time.
What are examples of: “You can’t be both”
Science is just studying yourself, your body, your own senses.
Keywords: Real, Fake, Bare Minimum, Set time aside for new things on schedule.
TIP: JSYK, wanting to write this itself is a form of an opinion itself. see below:
not do it unless pressured therefore it doesn’t become important or deemed as a necessary unless important, this is how you work as a human being, slight physical abuse
“how do you know?”
Being aware of specific motivation=studying science.
How to organize ideas so that they don’t produce any feelings
Is it necessary to think this as of right now? And are you what you what you think? For example thinking of pro-life ideals, vs. being pro-life? Any differences here?
Keywords: Relationship between,
Only emotional attachments make you want things to stay the same
What does socialist mean to you? A: depending on who you ask right wingers claim facasism because it personally hurts their businesses, but left wingers claim anti facasism because it hurts their civil liberties.
Think in terms of possible experiences measuring experiences
“Speaking for those who cannot speak for themselves”
time is something that is to be became aware of
Studying science is something that is to be specifically motivated by, what is nature motivated by?; And is science something that can be studied?
Are others a part of your body? When experiencing the living of life?
When confused, ask yourself: What are you experiencing, exactly?
“You shouldn’t be confused by specific facts, and if you are it implies that you are not willing to change to become a scientist”
I think that children need to be in science labs more than they need to be in school.
Asking questions requires identifying the variable that is to be ‘found out’ first.
What does the very fact that nobody is boring having friends or nobody is born wanting to have abortions imply?
What do your feelings depend on? is basically asking how do your feelings work
politics only exists because we respect each others desires and we treat each others’ desires as something different based upon it. we react differently based upon weather or not one is identifies similarly to us or not.
Everything you do, you actually only do for you, your feelings. Therefore, declining euthanasia is also done via done for the persons’ who declindes’ mental health
it changes, but what exactly is up for the people to decide.
Are the ideas shown in a negative light or is that the only way it can be shown, as in, is that the nature of the ideas? Eg, wanting to kill someone via the death penalty.
Thinking in terms of money or systematic influences.
all answers are answer’s to the question of why; for example, as a riddle, the answer is 45 what are the possible questions that lead to 45 as the answer?
Why do we define the word first? A: to avoid confusion
Proof that we are always manipulated to want as otherwise, as else: Stating: “i was a Marxist” vs. stating that “I wanted to pursue marxisms’
everybody feels, everybody feels the same way, etc.
knowing the value of money; This is proof that in order to make someone chase the goal of meaning, since meaning=short term feelings goal- basically an opinion.
“Value of a hard earned dollar”
Thought Process= depends on the actual process of experiencing itself. therefore, by using words, we are actually describing theoretical thought processes and not the present tense.
Motivated to forms of living
Life is just a series of cause and effect events and the more vague the more time it takes
Measuring “in terms of”
dividing people and nature in terms of rights motivated to id.
I am tired of attaching more feelings to thoughts, I need to care to set the goal to understand and not have an alive bias, not considering the past abuse type of mindset
the only thing you should know is this
i want to have no opinions is an opinion itself you know, you wanting to reach a state of mind where nothing means anything to you, motivated to identify as such
I am tired of pursuing opinions I want to pursue identifying facts
if you categorize it right and don’t make a big deal out of it then it will lead you to more ideas, as ideas=possibility; see: brain as a thought generator; since we can only perform one calculation at a time and conclude one idea at a time
curiosity is being unbiased over time, alive bias.
the important question is What does it mean to kids since kids=scientist, and we must be treated like kids and people must not push social boundaries.
picture of a baby
how to describe words using more words
If you were a person who didn’t know English the word baby wouldn’t have meant much to you, however, if you do speak English and are a laymen who doesn’t understand how definitions of words are set and considered, then you will fall victim to vague words and assigning meaning to them.
setting your own definitions, classifying words using your own words as a form of a process that is to be considered as a part of the process, language, this is why liberals travel more and know more language and don’t fall victim to semantics.
testing and setting limits, we are the govt.
labels don’t change a thing, definitions (considerations) do
scienitsts experts opinon
learning phase, and emphasizing facts phase since all is a form of learning
only one way to find out meme
wrong as a state of mind as of the process phase of idenitfying it as wrong, considering what ideally? interpreting such behavior as a new category called a ‘wrong’ behavior
the only thing that is a necessary evil is the republican’s existing themselves, we liberal elites exist to manipulate them to make them believe that we are the evil ones ..
considering defs indireclty judging, calling one as a baby
pragmatic motivation is contradiction with being more smart and needing to document
your reaction mean nothing to you years later
how intellectuals ruin society=they only ruin society from your feelings expressed via verbatim via the word ruin personally affected feelings.
pyschologically speaking, yes.
possible ideas=possible states of mind
one more couple more undocumented thoughts
sharing ideally meaning of supporting talkingisn’t much action behviaor needed
only possible way is this
tempt cause change varibable ask why don’t be dogmtic and mamke up conspiracies as to why academics lean left
interpreting feelings in the spot immediately as a process to become aware of the sitaution and feelings and be on top of it and rather not conform to it
health is wealth, literally
‘solely ideally calculate’ as keywords
applying thinking skills first or second? (basically think first, then pragmatics or vice versa?)
imagining the imagining of hypothetical ‘scenarios’
how to become unconfuzed when confuzed as first?
I hate pragmatics first, I want to think first, but pragmatics is a part of thinking
don’t practice playing basketball without calculating the physics behind every shot
using the label facts to distort the actual facts, why the word facts is useless in political context
If you’re pro life then you are rather emotionally attached to said fetus. Interpreting their behavior it’s a family value alive bias. this also means that since you are emotionally attached that you apply the same logic elsewhere to naturally loaded words. See: thinking similarities.
what are you emotionally attached to
keyword: thinking styles
don’t stop here,
there is a reason why we have words for studying and pragmatics, using for ideally studying or blindly doing
know how to understand set the goal to understand that is and not to kill curiosity feelings motivation-some of it is a necessary evil, like stopping others from considering killing others, most of it isn’t.
opinion doesn’t mean much to me
What is the body considering, physically?
emotionally attached to only one possible interpretations
I wish the thoughts in my head could just me documented as the voice in my head states it. I think so many new things, that I don’t have time to verbally document them each. Quality over quantity though, as expressed.
possible interpretation of the weather map; asking what are the possible opinions, interpretations is proof of being more open-minded and not emotionally attached to one view-rather adopting new views as you go, the goal isn’t to run a society, and law and order, rather the opposite.
you wont want to anymore morality forms of develop opinions
possible opinions; why does it matter that its mine it’s just a box not necessarily my box, ownership is chasing something that doesn’t exist
opinions are useless, it’s the process of identifying specific facts (aka the only types of facts) that is; see: scientific method as a thought process.
see: types of opinions
how to make up new words is the same thing as saying how to learn science, or how to use the scientific method, how to use senses to find out more
the dif between a fact and a feeling can only be id’d via death
ideas specific to experience=fact identifying; ideas specific to yolo=identifying bias. it cannot affect the kid in the same way it affects the scientist, one is identifying formulas, the others is playing which is also a form of identifying formulas – knowing what the body wants, aware of what you truly want.
Taking notes on curiosity whilst practicing it
This so called free market only looks free to the personally affected. the goal is to keep them in such a state of mind.
Pay attention to how the free market is defined, if it uses the same formula for definition as comparing one thing to another past event then it’s only saying a lack of govt. interventionalist is what makes is free is like labeling darkness as compared to the absence of light.
others as a necessary evil and the others as using for pragmatics
Without putting energy feelings, into identifying the specific issues at hand then you will not be able to correct the actual problem.
Keeping problems personal is the exact way the rich rule. Study social phycology.
Mental health is a part of physicals health.
instead of criticizing ideals of anti g*y rather interpret their behavior as liberals to show how it personally affects means to you
as long as people feel the need to, there will always be…
simple ‘solutions’ = as cops; deemed as solutions based on how the information personally ideally affects you.
pro life is creating problem that don’t even exist in the head of one, same thing with chasing and identifying morality
imaginary words as a contradiction
calling it stupid is Just as bad as calling it indoctrination basically you don’t care to understand why
conservatives love to make fun of libearls’ reactions.
far right is an example of smart but evil
how to do things if they don’t mean much to you
why do you think, consider this piece of information? What is the motivational phase? A: feelings
Conservatives abuse people and expect people to not have feelings, rather harden or man up as they call it, unfortunately we only need both types of people in society.
loaded words by nature why consider this
is free will as an idea the problem or the solution to the problem?
us liberals know that conservatives are the problem and not the solution to the problem, which is why we censor them, they aren’t anything special to us.
realistic theoretically; realistic theories, not socialisms, rather capitalism, which looks good via interpreting behavior , not solely as ideas.
conservatives cannot interpret behavior, they are always personally affected and have an opinion on something.
considering new opinions
most of the time, you don’t know it, rather are personally affected by it expressing personal opinions, which is exactly what conservatives want, your reaction, your a okay to engage.
don’t just emphasize political views as if they specifically only matter, rather consider the jobs they work, as that too is a form of communication that should be considered.
tempted to develop an opinion is an opinion itself
interpreting the behavior of you calling me mentally retarded I can come to the conclusion that is it you the one who is personally affected and in your feelings in the moment.
Is criteria set or identified? See: forced opinion, morals are forced opinions
I document things by the second, I don’t feel overwhelmed and motivated to organize such pieces of information otherwise.
vague word should stay meaningless
studying senses=curiosity=science=studying forms of physscholgy
do we exist to work
is the definition specific? “specifically vague”