TIP: Know what you’ll be doing first, then perform it; experience it; via the curriculum- the point is, is to know what will happen.
^ This proves that nothing is really new, rather we just experience the event in action.
why specifically me as in why me lord
it tastes like [it] feels like [it] etc.
sense of [privacy]
need something to work on as a problem to fix like cops schedule as interchange variables
meaning is feeling attachment
real reason for being pro life is feelings dopamine’s is produces problem solely in head
allowing self to want following policy
mapping out state of mind see it as a state of mind as a pov; look bad on paper (hitting in theory anything pragmatic) and bad on paper (socialisms good ideally state of mind); know the differences
How do you know, plan to change opinion later: means to look for new answers acknowledging the fact that you don’t know everything.
TIP: Follow curriculum, never make actual conclusions
The goal isn’t just to reach that state of mind for 1 or 2 seconds to receive a bit of a dopamine’s boost, but rather to maintain that until you die, and you can do this, (TIP HERE): VIA A SCHEDULE WITH INTERCHANGABLE VARIABLES, allowing yourself to want different things only at a certain time frame.
Science is just studying yourself, your own senses and how things: things as in atoms, particles, in specific, react to your existsiance (bodies’ senses) by the second.
Science is something that can happen to you not you happen to it
Set the goal to understand and you will have no feelings; As mentioned above if someone else gets in the way of you transferring info from surroundings, then that’s going to stop learning curriculum. Its like someone barging into science lab and coughing all over the place, the point is, is that it’s going to mess up some of experiments’ specifics.
Libertarianism and directly affecting
not everyone values the same ethics – this is proof that we put feelings on a different matter here. Using this sentence will only help one become aware of the fact that we are only emotionally attached to said sentences.
does everyone have the same basic ethics
According to the definition of ethics (moral principles that govern a person’s behavior or the conducting of an activity.), we are subconsciously actually constantly being governed by ideas of morality.
you don’t actually know this (are aware of this: because you cannot always put feeling into words) but you pretend more than you think that you do, for example when talking with others you delude yourself imagine physically respecting and pretend to respect them, which is deemed as actually respect someone since vague system and not nature reality system that’s how feelings work
you don’t actually touch anything; It has to do with measuring things existsiance of passage of events in terms of electrons.
check on scale unit of measurement
Feelings existing is proof that you are unnecessarily making a big deal out of something.
Always manipulated to want, possible desires, why do you think we need new lawmakers based on unexpected events that occur.
Does unexpected mean unaware since we are born scientists in the learning phase?
Being pro death penalty for the reasons of being confidence attached to the idea that it deters murderers is a personal problem not a pragmatically applicable problem, a problem that, potential murderers too, need to change themselves.
The drama, too, is a part of politics, it’s all intentional, and it acts as form or motivation or average people.
You see something as good and bad, it’s just that you don’t know it yet; For example liberals see being moral as bad and something that is to never to be engaged in (and will not change their minds about it), in the same way Republicans see murder as bad and would never even do it. And until republicans can acknowledge and sympathize with this liberal mindset, they will never be able to understand us.
Seeing it as a weakness vs. seeing it as a strength. For example, categorizing anti social behavior as a strength and not a weakness.
Liberals believe that merely being in the pro-life state of mind as something bad– as an infringement on civil liberties. They don’t want to change or have others change to be pro-life. See: seeing it as as state of mind, not as ideas or behaviors that are to be taken personally. Knowing when to take what personally.
Pro life as a form of woman abusing
And pro death penalty for born people is valid feelings to have.
acting in public is interpreted as vague behavior.
check on science fiction and nature of this specific physical realm
Check on “getting in the way of” Either you got in my way or I got in yours, is what morality is.
Conservative opinions are more opinionated, (need to measure public opinion here) meaning that they’re based on more feelings-related dogma. For example, they see the world in terms of property rights and not nature as nature. They use labels such as illegals to describes others’ desires, actions as divided.
by measuring opinions we are seeing how far you are deluded in your own world.
Saying I am an atheist is just saying I haven’t performed the calculation to conclude weather or not a God exists or not. It’s like saying I don’t know what the answer to 100×100 is because I am intimated (putting feelings into words here) by it’s large numbers.
In the same way one can submit and perform [2-proof that thoughts are just considerations] the thought of killing someone or not, the same thing with abortion, don’t act like a slave to ideas (aka the law that is supposed to be directly enforced)
Some things just aren’t meant to be, some contents are to be solely said and not written (at the same time, I don’t have 4 arms to do this you know!) and others are to be written and not stated
Fists speak (aka. violent behavior) (via behavior or paying attn aka. looking for to words) of peaceful voice speak
For me there is a difference in personal values and enforcing the contents of my values (see: labels don’t change contents of said person, only change what is as stored in your mind according to the nature of nature) onto others via the law; I am personally pro life, and but politically pro choice.
think in terms of possible definitions, think in terms of rights and wrong, think in terms of possible thinking in terms of. See: check on scale unit of measurement
Thinking in terms of variables, considering physicals subconsciously but not explicitly acknowledged via verbatim
Satisfied my only curiosity
Your feelings are my feelings
“It’s not there unless you think it is”
What if I was immune to stupidity, the only way to be this immune is if you didn’t have to be forced to experience it by time.
What are examples of: “You can’t be both”
Science is just studying yourself, your body, your own senses.
Keywords: Real, Fake, Bare Minimum, Set time aside for new things on schedule.
TIP: JSYK, wanting to write this itself is a form of an opinion itself. see below:
not do it unless pressured therefore it doesn’t become important or deemed as a necessary unless important, this is how you work as a human being, slight physical abuse
“how do you know?”
“You didn’t ask, [so] I didn’t tell” [1] [2]
Being aware of specific motivation=studying science.
How to organize ideas so that they don’t produce any feelings
Is it necessary to think this as of right now? And are you what you what you think? For example thinking of pro-life ideals, vs. being pro-life? Any differences here?
Keywords: Relationship between,
Only emotional attachments make you want things to stay the same
What does socialist mean to you? A: depending on who you ask right wingers claim facasism because it personally hurts their businesses, but left wingers claim anti facasism because it hurts their civil liberties.
Think in terms of possible experiences measuring experiences
“Speaking for those who cannot speak for themselves”
time is something that is to be became aware of
Studying science is something that is to be specifically motivated by, what is nature motivated by?; And is science something that can be studied?
Are others a part of your body? When experiencing the living of life?
When confused, ask yourself: What are you experiencing, exactly?
“You shouldn’t be confused by specific facts, and if you are it implies that you are not willing to change to become a scientist”
I think that children need to be in science labs more than they need to be in school.
Asking questions requires identifying the variable that is to be ‘found out’ first.
What does the very fact that nobody is boring having friends or nobody is born wanting to have abortions imply?
What do your feelings depend on? is basically asking how do your feelings work
politics only exists because we respect each others desires and we treat each others’ desires as something different based upon it. we react differently based upon weather or not one is identifies similarly to us or not.
Everything you do, you actually only do for you, your feelings. Therefore, declining euthanasia is also done via done for the persons’ who declindes’ mental health
it changes, but what exactly is up for the people to decide.
Are the ideas shown in a negative light or is that the only way it can be shown, as in, is that the nature of the ideas? Eg, wanting to kill someone via the death penalty.
Thinking in terms of money or systematic influences.
all answers are answer’s to the question of why; for example, as a riddle, the answer is 45 what are the possible questions that lead to 45 as the answer?
Why do we define the word first? A: to avoid confusion
Proof that we are always manipulated to want as otherwise, as else: Stating: “i was a Marxist” vs. stating that “I wanted to pursue marxisms’ end goals”
“nothing is a big deal unless you make it a big deal” – and you won’t know how important it is, until it’s gone[1,2,3].
everybody feels, everybody feels the same way, etc.
knowing the value of money; This is proof that in order to make someone chase the goal of meaning, since meaning=short term feelings goal- basically an opinion.
“Value of a hard earned dollar”
stop dreaming
Thought Process= depends on the actual process of experiencing itself. therefore, by using words, we are actually describing theoretical thought processes and not the present tense.
Motivated to forms of living
Ebenezers’ Freethinking Notes 